Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Linda Fruhvirtova vs Petra Marcinko Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fruhvirtova vs Marcinko analysis and find out who is favored!
Linda Fruhvirtova vs Petra Marcinko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fruhvirtova 0 - 0 Marcinko
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fruhvirtova has won 41% of points on his second serve, while Marcinko has won 41.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fruhvirtova, in recent form, has won 57.31% of his opponent's second serve points, while Marcinko has won 46.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.59% and 35.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fruhvirtova has saved 50.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marcinko has saved 46.15% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fruhvirtova has won 41.51% of matches played (W/L 22/ 31), with Marcinko winning 65.63% (W/L 21/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fruhvirtova has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 62/ 41), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6). Marcinko has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 51/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 9/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Fruhvirtova has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 44.83% of matches (W/L 13/ 16), where as Marcinko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72% of matches (W/L 18/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fruhvirtova has played against opponents with an average rank of 209.08 while Marcinko has played against players with an average rank of 274.22.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fruhvirtova has won 31% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marcinko has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fruhvirtova has converted 49.1% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marcinko has converted 36.84% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fruhvirtova 0 - 0 Marcinko
150
Rank
49
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
218
Rank
132
High
18
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
55% (93-77)
Career Total W/L
67% (80-40)
43% (10-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-3)
$850,307
Career Prize Money
$142,470
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Fruhvirtova VS Marcinko H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Linda Fruhvirtova | Petra Marcinko |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (10/13) | 0% (0/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (26/28) | 0% (0/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (252/250) | 34% (20/38) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (6/9) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 42 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0.45 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 112 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:58 | 1:26:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 223.09 | 246.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1043/1675) | 60% (111/186) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (645/1043) | 57% (63/111) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 40% (253/632) | 39% (29/75) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (102/210) | 35% (6/17) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (753/1643) | 38% (73/191) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (10/23) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 0% (3/0) |
Linda Fruhvirtova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Tatjana Maria
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
49%
(
47 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Viktorija Golubic
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
36 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Yuriko Miyazaki
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
42%
(
24 of
57)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Irina-Camelia Begu
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Claire Liu
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
67 of
107)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
12 of
40)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
47%
(
44 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Nicole Melichar
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
59%
(
63 of
106)
4
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
6
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
40%
(
17 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
54 of
106)
106
Total Points Won
96
|
7-5 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
2-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
62%
(
82 of
133)
1st Serve %
66%
(
81 of
122)
0
Aces
0
14
Double Faults
10
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
39%
(
20 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
48%
(
64 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
61 of
122)
130
Total Points Won
125
|
6-7(2) 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
76
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Emina Bektas
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Petra Marcinko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Petra Marcinko
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Petra Marcinko
70%
(
71 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(5) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Petra Marcinko
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Petra Marcinko
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
22%
(
2 of
9)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
50%
(
2 of
4)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
4
Total Points Won
11
|
0-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Petra Marcinko
71%
(
65 of
91)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
85)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
48%
(
44 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Marcinko
Player
Marina Bassols Ribera
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Petra Marcinko
Player
Leolia Jeanjean
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Petra Marcinko
Player
Alina Korneeva
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
49%
(
44 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Petra Marcinko
Player
Alice Robbe
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petra Marcinko
Player
Maria Bondarenko
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Fruhvirtova Vs Marcinko Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
